To assess the quality and value of 31 evaluations conducted by SEU between 2017 and 2021.
To improve future evaluation processes and maximize strategic impact.
📊 Key Findings
Evaluations varied in scope: end-of-project vs. mid-term, operational vs. non-operational.
Quality and usefulness of evaluations were influenced by organizational factors and clarity of objectives.
The report identified strengths in methodological rigor but also highlighted areas needing better follow-up and integration into decision-making.
🔍 Meta-Evaluation Questions Explored
How do SEU and OCB define evaluation quality?
What was the actual quality and value of past evaluations?
What organizational factors influenced evaluation outcomes?
🧠 Implications
The report emphasized the need for clearer evaluation frameworks, better stakeholder engagement, and more consistent use of findings in strategic planning.
✅ Recommendations
Strengthen internal systems for managing evaluations.
Improve transparency and accountability in the evaluation process.
Foster a culture of learning and adaptation based on evaluation insights.
To assess the quality and value of 31 evaluations conducted by SEU between 2017 and 2021.
To improve future evaluation processes and maximize strategic impact.
📊 Key Findings
Evaluations varied in scope: end-of-project vs. mid-term, operational vs. non-operational.
Quality and usefulness of evaluations were influenced by organizational factors and clarity of objectives.
The report identified strengths in methodological rigor but also highlighted areas needing better follow-up and integration into decision-making.
🔍 Meta-Evaluation Questions Explored
How do SEU and OCB define evaluation quality?
What was the actual quality and value of past evaluations?
What organizational factors influenced evaluation outcomes?
🧠 Implications
The report emphasized the need for clearer evaluation frameworks, better stakeholder engagement, and more consistent use of findings in strategic planning.
✅ Recommendations
Strengthen internal systems for managing evaluations.
Improve transparency and accountability in the evaluation process.
Foster a culture of learning and adaptation based on evaluation insights.
To assess the quality and value of 31 evaluations conducted by SEU between 2017 and 2021.
To improve future evaluation processes and maximize strategic impact.
📊 Key Findings
Evaluations varied in scope: end-of-project vs. mid-term, operational vs. non-operational.
Quality and usefulness of evaluations were influenced by organizational factors and clarity of objectives.
The report identified strengths in methodological rigor but also highlighted areas needing better follow-up and integration into decision-making.
🔍 Meta-Evaluation Questions Explored
How do SEU and OCB define evaluation quality?
What was the actual quality and value of past evaluations?
What organizational factors influenced evaluation outcomes?
🧠 Implications
The report emphasized the need for clearer evaluation frameworks, better stakeholder engagement, and more consistent use of findings in strategic planning.
✅ Recommendations
Strengthen internal systems for managing evaluations.
Improve transparency and accountability in the evaluation process.
Foster a culture of learning and adaptation based on evaluation insights.
English